Skip to main content

About your Search

20130201
20130228
STATION
WETA 3
KCSM (PBS) 2
KQED (PBS) 2
KRCB (PBS) 2
WJLA (ABC) 1
LANGUAGE
English 10
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
WETA
Feb 1, 2013 8:30pm EST
answer. >> what about this jewish lobby business? he apologized for using that phrase, but listen to this exchange with lindsey graham. >> name one person who is intimidated by the israeli lobby in the u.s. senate. >> the use of intimidation -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one person publicly. this is gamesmanship of the first order. you have conversations with plenty members of congress, and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middle east and feel they simply cannot move an inch on questions involving israel. >> is chuck hagel in command of the issues that he will be grappling with here? >> i do not think anybody would have come off well. it was a halting performance by chuck hagel, and chuck hagel, to underline what nina said earlier, is not a verbally- nimble person. he is not known for sound bites, not somebody that you go to if you want a quotation on a deadline. he will give you thought full context. >> god forbid. [laughter] >> more than anything else, i could not get over the back during quality. yes or no, yes or no, senator. john mccai
PBS
Feb 3, 2013 6:00pm PST
lobby phrase? he apologized for using that phrase, but listen to this exchange. >> name one person who is intimidated by the israeli lobby in the u.s. senate. >> the use of intimidation -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one person publicly. this is gamesmanship of the first order. you have conversations with plenty of members of congress and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middle east, that they simply cannot move an inch on issues involving israel. >> is he in command of the issues? >> i do not think anybody would have come off well. i think it was a halting performance by chuck hagel, and chuck hagel underline what nina said earlier, not a burbling- nimble person. not a guy that is known for sound bites, not somebody that you would go to for a quotation on deadlines. he would give the thought of context or any answer he would give -- >> god forbid. [laughter] >> more than anything else, i could not get over the badger and quality. yes or no. yes or no, senator. john mccain was looking for vindication for the surge. chuck hagel was not going to gi
ABC
Feb 3, 2013 9:00am EST
. >> what about this jewish lobby business? he apologized for using that phrase. listen to this exchange with lindsey gram. >> name one person who is intimited by the israeli lobby in the united states. >> the use of intimidation -- i should have used influence. >> he could not name one pern publblicly. this is gamesmanship of the first ororder. you have conversations with plty of members of congress, and they feel one way about some of the issues in the middl east, feel thathey simply cannot move an inch on that. >> is he in command of the issues he will be grappling with? >> i do not think anybody would have come off wl. it was a halting performance by chuck hagel. chuck hagel, to underline what nina sd earlier is not a verbally-nimble person. not somebody known for sound bites, not somebody that you would go to for a quotation on a deadline. he would give the thoughtful context. >> god forbid.wright, who once context? [laughter] i cod not get over the badger and quality. yes or no. yeoro, senator. john mccain was looking for viication for the surge. chuck hagel was not going to give i
PBS
Feb 24, 2013 6:00pm PST
scenarios. >> it was his idea. he signed it into law and now he's going to tell us that it's all our fault? >> the cyber wars. is china hacking us blind? >> of starting a broad swath of western organizations. >> you might as well pick a card out of the deck as to who will get the death penalty. >> some of them will say it's a bad idea. >> the brash new kid on the block. >> i was elected to speak the truth. captioned by the national captioning institute --www.ncicap.org-- quite sequestration. march 1st is the deadline. they warn 800,000 civilian employees will have to take unpaid leave in federal employee workers will have to take a cut for the next six months. the long lines at the airport, travel delays. you may want to be careful what you eat because food safety inspectors will be affected. they will be taking a hit. salaries in congress are safe, but they tell us none of this is supposed to happen. >> it was never meant to become implemented policy. >> and now they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments and all the jobs that depend on them? or
WETA
Feb 22, 2013 8:30pm EST
signed it into law and now he's going to tell us that it's all our fault? >> the cyber wars. is china acting as a blind? >> this is run by the chinese liberation army and is targeting a broad swath of western companies. >> and a look at the death penalty. >> you may as well pick a card out of the deck. >> not a single justice will say is unconstitutional, but some will say it's a bad idea. >> in the senate, the brash new kid on the block. >> at the end of the day, i was elected to speak for 26 million texans and speak the truth. >> quest rationed. march 1st as the deadline. they warn 800,000 civilian employees -- sequestration. a 20% cut in pay for six months. flying will be tougher. long lines at the airport, travel delays. you may want to be careful what you eat because food safety inspectors will be effected. fbi and law enforcement will take a hit. member salaries in congress are safe but the staff will take a hit. they tell us non was supposed to happen. >> it was never supposed to be implemented policy. >> they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vita
PBS
Feb 24, 2013 3:00pm PST
. they will be taking a hit. salaries in congress are safe, but they tell us none of this is supposed to happen. >> it was never meant to become implemented policy. >> and now they face a simple choice. are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments and all the jobs that depend on them? or would they rather put hundreds of thousands of jobs and our entire economy at risk just to protect a few special interest tax loopholes that benefit only the wealthiest and biggest corporations? >> of sequestration was never meant to be implemented, then why was it implemented? >> the president is the one guy who can step above it and he's just playing politics. >> are we having fun yet? >> there is a sense of sleepwalking as we head toward the first of march and i think republicans are making it a serious political mistake to be on the subject of the issue in underestimating how much of their buying to be blamed for what happens. >> do you think the armageddon scenario is being overplayed? >> it is the biggest since the mayan calendar. it's ridiculous. here we are spending $3 trillion per year f
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)